[POLL]Multiple Discs: Does it matter?

BlackStigma wrote:

DukemNukem43 wrote:

It does to me. If you a lose and/or break a disc, you're fucked. End of story.

No it doesn't. You change disks all the time when you want to play a different game, changing disks a few more times is no big deal. I'd rather have 4 disks than be forced to do a 3gig install.

My 360 fucked up my ME2 2nd disc....

So, GTFO.

Sonji wrote:

BlackStigma wrote:

DukemNukem43 wrote:

It does to me. If you a lose and/or break a disc, you're fucked. End of story.

No it doesn't. You change disks all the time when you want to play a different game, changing disks a few more times is no big deal. I'd rather have 4 disks than be forced to do a 3gig install.

My 360 fucked up my ME2 2nd disc....

So, GTFO.

You lack logic. If ME2 was a one disc game on 360 and it broke you'd be equally as fucked if not more. I mean atleast you can play half the game .

Mecha wrote:

Well that's one pro to multiple disks, even if Gears 1 DLC was already free. But why is he speaking so weird?

BlackStigma wrote:

Mecha wrote:

Well that's one pro to multiple disks, even if Gears 1 DLC was already free. But why is he speaking so weird?

i think he is making fun of the ps3 fanboys

TRF wrote:

Lykos wrote:

DukemNukem43 wrote:

It does to me. If you a lose and/or break a disc, you're fucked. End of story.

if you lose and/or break a single disk you're fucked. End of story.

True, but there are more discs to worry about when a game is on two or more discs.

Is it so hard to just do with the second disk what you do with the first disk? When not in use, put it in the case. Treat it like a seperate game if you must. I mean the average gamer has what, 10 games per console? (I for one have over 20 but nevermind) so really a second disk is like having another game in your collection. And when you buy a new game you don't say "oh shit, another game, now there's a higher chance of me losing a game". ...just sayin' ;P

IT SUKSS ASS BECUZ ITS INFERIURZ.

Lykos wrote:

TRF wrote:

Lykos wrote:

DukemNukem43 wrote:

It does to me. If you a lose and/or break a disc, you're fucked. End of story.

if you lose and/or break a single disk you're fucked. End of story.

True, but there are more discs to worry about when a game is on two or more discs.

Is it so hard to just do with the second disk what you do with the first disk? When not in use, put it in the case. Treat it like a seperate game if you must. I mean the average gamer has what, 10 games per console? (I for one have over 20 but nevermind) so really a second disk is like having another game in your collection. And when you buy a new game you don't say "oh shit, another game, now there's a higher chance of me losing a game". ...just sayin' ;P

This.

If you aren't a dumbass and don't treat your games like shit it won't be a problem.

if it means i dont have to get up

so YES it does matter
:nyan:

Alanski wrote:

It does seem funny to me that only now multi-disc games are too much of a hassle. I guess it didn't matter last gen because both the PS2 and Xbox used DVD amirite? Idiots now use the multi-disc thing as leverage in a console war debate, it's ridiculous.

Yeah I notice it myself and the reason why I made this topic. It's funny how a few certain youtubers are getting into this fight either for or against.

TheJubJub5721 wrote:

Lykos wrote:

TRF wrote:

Lykos wrote:

DukemNukem43 wrote:

It does to me. If you a lose and/or break a disc, you're fucked. End of story.

if you lose and/or break a single disk you're fucked. End of story.

True, but there are more discs to worry about when a game is on two or more discs.

Is it so hard to just do with the second disk what you do with the first disk? When not in use, put it in the case. Treat it like a seperate game if you must. I mean the average gamer has what, 10 games per console? (I for one have over 20 but nevermind) so really a second disk is like having another game in your collection. And when you buy a new game you don't say "oh shit, another game, now there's a higher chance of me losing a game". ...just sayin' ;P

This.

If you aren't a dumbass and don't treat your games like shit it won't be a problem.

:afro: respect yo games... an they respect you.

Lykos wrote:

TRF wrote:

Lykos wrote:

DukemNukem43 wrote:

It does to me. If you a lose and/or break a disc, you're fucked. End of story.

if you lose and/or break a single disk you're fucked. End of story.

True, but there are more discs to worry about when a game is on two or more discs.

Is it so hard to just do with the second disk what you do with the first disk? When not in use, put it in the case. Treat it like a seperate game if you must. I mean the average gamer has what, 10 games per console? (I for one have over 20 but nevermind) so really a second disk is like having another game in your collection. And when you buy a new game you don't say "oh shit, another game, now there's a higher chance of me losing a game". ...just sayin' ;P

You don't say that, but it is true. You do have a higher chance of losing a game. The only problem is that of those games, you have a greater chance of losing one that is on multiple discs.

But hey, like I said, I'm only explaining his argument. Personally I have no problem with multiple discs, but I'll always buy the single-disc version unless the multi-disc version is drastically superior.

It has never annoyed me..

And some games I own has more then 5 or 6 discs...

Alanski wrote:

Sonji wrote:

BlackStigma wrote:

DukemNukem43 wrote:

It does to me. If you a lose and/or break a disc, you're fucked. End of story.

No it doesn't. You change disks all the time when you want to play a different game, changing disks a few more times is no big deal. I'd rather have 4 disks than be forced to do a 3gig install.

My 360 fucked up my ME2 2nd disc....

So, GTFO.

You lack logic. If ME2 was a one disc game on 360 and it broke you'd be equally as fucked if not more. I mean atleast you can play half the game .

This is your fault D: So, GTMFO.

Sonji wrote:

Alanski wrote:

Sonji wrote:

BlackStigma wrote:

DukemNukem43 wrote:

It does to me. If you a lose and/or break a disc, you're fucked. End of story.

No it doesn't. You change disks all the time when you want to play a different game, changing disks a few more times is no big deal. I'd rather have 4 disks than be forced to do a 3gig install.

My 360 fucked up my ME2 2nd disc....

So, GTFO.

You lack logic. If ME2 was a one disc game on 360 and it broke you'd be equally as fucked if not more. I mean atleast you can play half the game .

This is your fault D: So, GTMFO.

Well as long as M$ gets your money then I have once again done my job.

Like games with multiple discs. Feels like I'm putting in a brand new game in once I finish the first disc :)

All I know is that it takes me 10 fucking minutes to install my average ps3 exclusive game when i first buy it but only takes me 10 seconds to switch discs on my xbox......

If i had the choice to get a game in one disc or multiple discs, then i would easily go for one single disc without even thinking about it.

Thats all i gotta say on this subject.