E3 Press Conference

Alanski wrote:

TRF wrote:

I know, but then you're purposely leaving out a huge chunk of Sony's conference which is relevant to PS3 gamers.

You're the one over-analyzing my statement. I'm so tired of argueing semantics with people. That I'm just going to drop it.

I'm not. I think you're the one who is making such a specific statement. My point is that Vita is relevant to the PS3 audience while Kinect, for the most part, is not relevant to the 360 audience. So in terms of hardcore offerings, Sony had more to show. Yes, in terms of console offerings, you're right, but I don't think the Vita should be left out because it's relevant to PS3 gamers.

I'm the one who is taking a step back and looking at the whole picture while you're the one who is being so specific that your argument becomes airtight.

TRF wrote:

Alanski wrote:

TRF wrote:

I know, but then you're purposely leaving out a huge chunk of Sony's conference which is relevant to PS3 gamers.

You're the one over-analyzing my statement. I'm so tired of argueing semantics with people. That I'm just going to drop it.

I'm not. I think you're the one who is making such a specific statement. My point is that Vita is relevant to the PS3 audience while Kinect, for the most part, is not relevant to the 360 audience. So in terms of hardcore offerings, Sony had more to show. Yes, in terms of console offerings, you're right, but I don't think the Vita should be left out because it's relevant to PS3 gamers.

I'm the one who is taking a step back and looking at the whole picture while you're the one who is being so specific that your argument becomes airtight.

They're implementing Kinect into Core games and creating Core games for it. Microsoft is still trying to sell Kinect because it's a cash cow but they're still trying to go beyond the casuals. Kinect is just as relevant to 360 gamers as Vita is to PS3 gamers. And another thing, Kinect is a 360 ad on, Vita is a whole new system, not everyone who will get Vita even has a PS3. Look at Lykos, he jizzes all over his PSP everyday yet doesn't even have a PS3. Plus Kinect is one hundred dollars cheaper and will probably get a price drop soon.

BlackStigma wrote:

They're implementing Kinect into Core games and creating Core games for it. Microsoft is still trying to sell Kinect because it's a cash cow but they're still trying to go beyond the casuals. Kinect is just as relevant to 360 gamers as Vita is to PS3 gamers. And another thing, Kinect is a 360 ad on, Vita is a whole new system, not everyone who will get Vita even has a PS3. Look at Lykos, he jizzes all over his PSP everyday yet doesn't even have a PS3. Plus Kinect is one hundred dollars cheaper and will probably get a price drop soon.

Fair point. I still thought Sony was better, though. To each his own. I don't see Kinect's involvement in the core audience as being even comparable to the Vita's involvement, but whatever.

TRF wrote:

BlackStigma wrote:

They're implementing Kinect into Core games and creating Core games for it. Microsoft is still trying to sell Kinect because it's a cash cow but they're still trying to go beyond the casuals. Kinect is just as relevant to 360 gamers as Vita is to PS3 gamers. And another thing, Kinect is a 360 ad on, Vita is a whole new system, not everyone who will get Vita even has a PS3. Look at Lykos, he jizzes all over his PSP everyday yet doesn't even have a PS3. Plus Kinect is one hundred dollars cheaper and will probably get a price drop soon.

Fair point. I still thought Sony was better, though. To each his own. I don't see Kinect's involvement in the core audience as being even comparable to the Vita's involvement, but whatever.

I can see it's involvement being as big. Get a hardcore gamer in here that DOESN'T want to yell at Garrus to stop his god damn calibrations and have him actually respond.

BlackStigma wrote:

TRF wrote:

Alanski wrote:

TRF wrote:

I know, but then you're purposely leaving out a huge chunk of Sony's conference which is relevant to PS3 gamers.

You're the one over-analyzing my statement. I'm so tired of argueing semantics with people. That I'm just going to drop it.

I'm not. I think you're the one who is making such a specific statement. My point is that Vita is relevant to the PS3 audience while Kinect, for the most part, is not relevant to the 360 audience. So in terms of hardcore offerings, Sony had more to show. Yes, in terms of console offerings, you're right, but I don't think the Vita should be left out because it's relevant to PS3 gamers.

I'm the one who is taking a step back and looking at the whole picture while you're the one who is being so specific that your argument becomes airtight.

They're implementing Kinect into Core games and creating Core games for it. Microsoft is still trying to sell Kinect because it's a cash cow but they're still trying to go beyond the casuals. Kinect is just as relevant to 360 gamers as Vita is to PS3 gamers. And another thing, Kinect is a 360 ad on, Vita is a whole new system, not everyone who will get Vita even has a PS3. Look at Lykos, he jizzes all over his PSP everyday yet doesn't even have a PS3. Plus Kinect is one hundred dollars cheaper and will probably get a price drop soon.

Price is irrelevent when comparing Kinect to PS Vita. Unless of course you could play the Kinect without the 360 or if the PS Vita needed a PS3 to function.

Okay why the fuck are we comparing a full body motion device to a handheld device? Thats like comparing apples and oranges......

Toxicmaniac wrote:

Okay why the fuck are we comparing a full body motion device to a handheld device? Thats like comparing apples and oranges......

No idea...

Reaper wrote:

Remember folks, its the SONY and MICROSOFT conferences, not the PS3 and 360 conferences. Vita is relevant in every way because of this as is Kinect for Microsoft as they are places to show off new products as well as software.

That being said, Vita offers alot more for ME than Kinect would. I'm just not interested in motion controls hence i don't own a Wii or PlayStation Move despite the tech being functional. The PlayStation Vita offers ME games that are essentially handheld expansions/sequels/prequels? to games that i already own and like on my PS3.

I'm going to go with Sony because they showed ME more content that i'm interested in, while yes it was a bit boring because there was little in the way of shock announcements like Microsoft did with Halo 4.

Again lets not forget that while this is a poll, it doesnt matter who gets more votes, whoever you cast your vote for automatically wins for YOU because that corporation offered YOU more content that YOU are interested in.

No offense, but you sound like one of those gamer hippies lol

Reaper wrote:

Remember folks, its the SONY and MICROSOFT conferences, not the PS3 and 360 conferences. Vita is relevant in every way because of this as is Kinect for Microsoft as they are places to show off new products as well as software.

That being said, Vita offers alot more for ME than Kinect would. I'm just not interested in motion controls hence i don't own a Wii or PlayStation Move despite the tech being functional. The PlayStation Vita offers ME games that are essentially handheld expansions/sequels/prequels? to games that i already own and like on my PS3.

I'm going to go with Sony because they showed ME more content that i'm interested in, while yes it was a bit boring because there was little in the way of shock announcements like Microsoft did with Halo 4.

Again lets not forget that while this is a poll, it doesnt matter who gets more votes, whoever you cast your vote for automatically wins for YOU because that corporation offered YOU more content that YOU are interested in.

UMFG UR TRYING 2 MEAK IT LUUK LYK A FACT!!!!

Reaper wrote:

Remember folks, its the SONY and MICROSOFT conferences, not the PS3 and 360 conferences. Vita is relevant in every way because of this as is Kinect for Microsoft as they are places to show off new products as well as software.

That being said, Vita offers alot more for ME than Kinect would. I'm just not interested in motion controls hence i don't own a Wii or PlayStation Move despite the tech being functional. The PlayStation Vita offers ME games that are essentially handheld expansions/sequels/prequels? to games that i already own and like on my PS3.

I'm going to go with Sony because they showed ME more content that i'm interested in, while yes it was a bit boring because there was little in the way of shock announcements like Microsoft did with Halo 4.

Again lets not forget that while this is a poll, it doesnt matter who gets more votes, whoever you cast your vote for automatically wins for YOU because that corporation offered YOU more content that YOU are interested in.

Nah MS did better...

I mean...FORZA 4!!!!!! AAHHH