Killzone 3 Review From IGN

http://ps3.ign.com/articles/114/1147560p1.html

i gotta admit..the score is a bit disappointing but its still great

I think its fair enough. Good score though.

As expected, pretty annoying how people start bitching how it's "so low" though.

BlackStigma wrote:

As expected, pretty annoying how people start bitching how it's "so low" though.

its not soo low..
its just that killzone 2 got a 9.4 which is pretty high and this one only got 8.5..its a great score but i expected more

Pein wrote:

BlackStigma wrote:

As expected, pretty annoying how people start bitching how it's "so low" though.

its not soo low..
its just that killzone 2 got a 9.4 which is pretty high and this one only got 8.5..its a great score but i expected more

I meant the people in the comment section of the review.

I have one thing to say. Black ops and MW2 had a higher score

Well ive played the multi player a lot both beta's and have experienced it over 20 hours gameplay.

Guerilla must of fucked up on the campaign to drop from a 9.4 to a 8.5 and it must be the only reason as the multi player is much better than killzone 2 by far.

Leaving the only culprit to the story... ill soon find out when its released

Franko wrote:

I have one thing to say. Black ops and MW2 had a higher score

black ops got 8.5 also..mw2 got even a bigger score than kz2

I'd give KZ3 a 9/10 even if single player was god awful. The beta is pretty damn fun.

Franko wrote:

I have one thing to say. Black ops and MW2 had a higher score

I have one thing to say. IGN.


But I say the score is deserved. Killzone was not that great IMO.

Does not compute

im getting it either way..btw it got 9.4 from gametrailers while kz2 got 9.2

Did they seriously take away points for the story in a FPS?

87 on metacritic so far.
To be fair, most shooters don't deserve a AAA score anyway. I reckon KZ3's as good as any other out there.
Don't let reviews influence your decision. This is a great game and you know it.

reaper wrote:

I'll never understand how they can rate it lower than Killzone 2, they improved everything that people bitched about. Either the campaign is god awful like Mike suggested or IGN and Gamestop are trolling for page hits.

Nah, it's just that these days there are so many shooters that critics are a little cynical. I mean Black Ops pretty much improved over MW2 in so many ways, yet it didn't get AAA.

Lykos wrote:

87 on metacritic so far.
To be fair, most shooters don't deserve a AAA score anyway. I reckon KZ3's as good as any other out there.
Don't let reviews influence your decision. This is a great game and you know it.

reaper wrote:

I'll never understand how they can rate it lower than Killzone 2, they improved everything that people bitched about. Either the campaign is god awful like Mike suggested or IGN and Gamestop are trolling for page hits.

Nah, it's just that these days there are so many shooters that critics are a little cynical. I mean Black Ops pretty much improved over MW2 in so many ways, yet it didn't get AAA.

Yea I mean. Black Ops was a major improvement.

More lag, downgraded visuals, shitty campaign, etc. HOW COULD IT NOT BE AAA!?!?!

I'm really amped for this game.

TRF wrote:

I'm really amped for this game.

Didn't you say you don't like KillZone?

Teckno wrote:

TRF wrote:

I'm really amped for this game.

Didn't you say you don't like KillZone?

LOL. Not that Playslave.

Been saying KZ3 beta is better than Halo Reach almost all of the second half of last year. Personally, I don't even see how Halo and Killzone even compare.

it stiill looks like fun but to each there own about fps storys.