Crysis MP

:bounce:

0:51, Halo anyone?

from the looks of the trailer it looks like when u press l1 its not hold down to aim and u have to tap it like kz2, yuck lol

i believe they said that there's going to be a exclusive xbox live mp demo on january 25th.

heres the link

http://www.joystiq.com/2011/01/21/crysis-2-multiplayer-demo-hitting-xbox-live-exclusively-on-jan/

can't wait to play it

Lookin' pretty good. Depending on how the MP demo is I might pick this up.

I jizzed when i saw the trailer. it looks....so...amazing :salivate: :

I base my judgment of a multiplayer game on straight up gameplay, not trailers like these. Sure, it looks cool, but frankly it's the same boring game we saw at E3 with cool music and some situations that you will probably never experience in the multiplayer.

Not interested. The first game wasn't really that great, apart from the graphics, its just seemed like a another FPS. I don't really see this one being any different

TRF wrote:

I base my judgment of a multiplayer game on straight up gameplay, not trailers like these. Sure, it looks cool, but frankly it's the same boring game we saw at E3 with cool music and some situations that you will probably never experience in the multiplayer.

True. Most multiplayer games show these awesome invasions and epic huge battles in their gameplay but its all staged and will more then likely never happen. MAG especially did that

TheJubJub5721 wrote:

TRF wrote:

I base my judgment of a multiplayer game on straight up gameplay, not trailers like these. Sure, it looks cool, but frankly it's the same boring game we saw at E3 with cool music and some situations that you will probably never experience in the multiplayer.

True. Most multiplayer games show these awesome invasions and epic huge battles in their gameplay but its all staged and will more then likely never happen. MAG especially did that

I remember drooling over MAG initially. They boasted like 216-player MP (I think it was 216) and said that every player had a special role, and they made it seem like a full-scale war where you had a part to play.

Then the beta came out and it was pretty average.

TRF wrote:

TheJubJub5721 wrote:

TRF wrote:

I base my judgment of a multiplayer game on straight up gameplay, not trailers like these. Sure, it looks cool, but frankly it's the same boring game we saw at E3 with cool music and some situations that you will probably never experience in the multiplayer.

True. Most multiplayer games show these awesome invasions and epic huge battles in their gameplay but its all staged and will more then likely never happen. MAG especially did that

I remember drooling over MAG initially. They boasted like 216-player MP (I think it was 216) and said that every player had a special role, and they made it seem like a full-scale war where you had a part to play.

Then the beta came out and it was pretty average.

It's 256 players.

And yea, the reason why it feels average is because the number of players and the size of the maps are scaled to each other. The amount of enemies you encounter in any given moment will feel the same whether you are playing against hundreds of players on a huge map or a dozen players on a small sized map.

Demo was really disappointing. Was really hyped for it.

Felt like just another FPS.

Bulletstorm demo was better although...immature.

Pickles1337 wrote:

Demo was really disappointing. Was really hyped for it.

Felt like just another FPS.

Bulletstorm demo was better although...immature.

bulletstorm was awesome, but I can see it getting old, FAST. And the auto aim is way to much in that game...

I liked it. It just feels..... Like it's missing something.

TheJubJub5721 wrote:

Pickles1337 wrote:

Demo was really disappointing. Was really hyped for it.

Felt like just another FPS.

Bulletstorm demo was better although...immature.

bulletstorm was awesome, but I can see it getting old, FAST. And the auto aim is way to much in that game...

Bulletstorm is immature. Idk that put me off tbh.