Crysis 2 FPS Graphics King: Didn't Last Long

http://www.lensoftruth.com/head2head/head2head-killzone-3-vs-crysis-2-analysis/#comments

I knew you were going to post this.

I am not surprised tho. And i don't really give a shit. I knew killzone 3 looked better. It was the damn lighting.

Yeah, I always thought Killzone 3 looked better.

I should get KZ3 in the mail in a few days so I can see for myself.

Crysis 2 looks like a ps2 game.

Guerilla games are over-achievers with graphics.

The opening star ship battle on the ocean shooting away at the helghast... Orgasm.

Crysis 2 is much funner than KZ3..

Alanski wrote:

Crysis 2 is much funner than KZ3..

Too bad the MP is absolute shit and the story can be a steaming pile of horse shit most of the time :/

Alanski wrote:

Crysis 2 is much funner than KZ3..

Cause it's in New York amirite?

Teckno wrote:

Alanski wrote:

Crysis 2 is much funner than KZ3..

Cause it's in New York amirite?

Ya. New York is generally more chaotic. Great place for a battlefield but a shit place to live

TheUltimateDouche wrote:

Alanski wrote:

Crysis 2 is much funner than KZ3..

Too bad the MP is absolute shit and the story can be a steaming pile of horse shit most of the time :/

"MP is absolute shit" Riiight.

^^

I honestly didn't enjoy it that much. Most of the maps are absolute balls.

TheUltimateDouche wrote:

^^

I honestly didn't enjoy it that much. Most of the maps are absolute balls.

Well honestly, the MP system in KZ3 is just terrible. The lobby system is shit and the voting system makes it to where the same map is chosen almost all the time in Guerilla Warfare.

Alanski wrote:

TheUltimateDouche wrote:

^^

I honestly didn't enjoy it that much. Most of the maps are absolute balls.

Well honestly, the MP system in KZ3 is just terrible. The lobby system is shit and the voting system makes it to where the same map is chosen almost all the time in Guerilla Warfare.

But here's the thing: Killzone 3's multiplayer is actually fun.

TRF wrote:

Alanski wrote:

TheUltimateDouche wrote:

^^

I honestly didn't enjoy it that much. Most of the maps are absolute balls.

Well honestly, the MP system in KZ3 is just terrible. The lobby system is shit and the voting system makes it to where the same map is chosen almost all the time in Guerilla Warfare.

But here's the thing: Killzone 3's multiplayer is actually fun.

Uh, so is C2's... The difference here is that C2 has a better lobby system and a more rewarding leveling system.

Crysis 2 is basically Call of Duty but with cyber suits that don't add much to the gameplay.

TRF wrote:

Crysis 2 is basically Call of Duty but with cyber suits that don't add much to the gameplay.

They add alot to the gameplay. It's makes the game generally alot faster paced and lets you play the game how you want to play it.

people people. They are both shit

Got killzone 3 and crysis 2 last week and i totally agree (i'll do a joint review some time this week). I will say killzone's multiplayer doesn't feel like an afterthought.

After completing Crysis 2, I think it just beats KZ 3 in the visual department. The lighting in the game is gorgeous.

Possibly the best looking console game.

I finished Killzone 3 today and spent a lot of time in multiplayer. I think Killzone 3 looks a lot better and is in general just a better game. Crysis 2 had a pretty good campaign but a lousy multiplayer. Unfortunately, they're both pretty underwhelming. Good thing I didn't actually buy them, I bought Crysis 2 but then returned it, and Killzone 3 I just rented.

@Reaper
Oh hell no lol, that is one reason I rented it though.