2016 US primaries thread

Toxicmaniac wrote:

Teckno wrote:

How can you forget this candidate Toxic?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?

http://www.rollingstone.com/music/videos/waka-flocka-flame-for-president-watch-his-exclusive-campaign-video-20150420

Finally a true leader.

Weed and prosperity.... But mostly weed.

Lil Wayne for president.

Honestly people who do weed should be fucking executed, scum the lot of them

Long needed update.

From the Republican party three new candidates have announced their presidency. Ben Carson, Mike Huckabee and Carly Fiorina.

As for the Democrats Hillary finally gets her first rival as Bernie Sanders has announced he will be running for Democrats.

I also updated and edited a bit for third party candidates who have expressed interests (Bit harder to find information for them)

Bernie Sanders 2016

I'm still feeling certain that Hillary will win. It just seems inevitable, at this point.

Oh well, at least there's no more O-BOMB-AH!

but benghazi

Republicans, Republicans everywhere.

We now have George Pataki who is known for being one of the most moderate (but authoritarian) within the Republican party. And *deep sigh* Rick Santorum.

I'm glad Santorum is in it. Only because of the lulz of his idiocy and goofiness.

An amazing match up would be Bernie Sanders vs Rand Paul. Now that would be a sight to see.

Can anyone seriously claim Clinton hasn't been bought by the banks?

Teckno wrote:

Can anyone seriously claim Clinton hasn't been bought by the banks?

Go BERNIE!

Martin O'Malley and Lindsey Graham are in the race.

Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan are the biggest offenders of rampant funding. They fund pretty much every big establishment politician no matter if it's Democrat or Republican.

This is from the 2012 election:

America will never win because Americans are just too politically ignorant. You guys sound like you need PR, well first you'd actually need more than two parties. Actually I have no clue about US politicis, I do hope we get PR, I've also joined a political party.

Why do I feel like the people in the audience were being sarcastic lmao.

Oh Trump, I will enjoy seeing your stupidity ooze out of you in the debates.

Even Donald Trump wouldn't vote for Donald Trump.

The Donald isn't a politician. He can't convince people to give him billions over a bullshit apocalypse theory. But considering he actually understands the effect of government policy on jobs, he's leagues more qualified than the incompetent quack that wins the average democracy.

Angelus wrote:

The Donald isn't a politician.   He can't convince people to give him billions over a bullshit apocalypse theory.  But considering he actually understands the effect of government policy on jobs, he's leagues more qualified than the incompetent quack that wins the average democracy.

Didn't he inherit all his fortune and then just declare bankruptcies over and over again? He seems like a pretty shit businessman

http://thedailyshow.cc.com/videos/gyhfub/democalypse-2016---white-house-don?xrs=synd_facebook_062215_tds_40

Angelus wrote:

The Donald isn't a politician.   He can't convince people to give him billions over a bullshit apocalypse theory.  But considering he actually understands the effect of government policy on jobs, he's leagues more qualified than the incompetent quack that wins the average democracy.

To an extent this is true. But he has people under him who worry about the full picture when it comes to economics. Trump is more of a face for a brand more than anything else.

The_Biotic_God wrote:

Angelus wrote:

The Donald isn't a politician.   He can't convince people to give him billions over a bullshit apocalypse theory.  But considering he actually understands the effect of government policy on jobs, he's leagues more qualified than the incompetent quack that wins the average democracy.

To an extent this is true. But he has people under him who worry about the full picture when it comes to economics. Trump is more of a face for a brand more than anything else.

The big advantage to having him, would be his disinterest in visiting SJW organizations for suggestions, and his willingness to run a country like an REIT, instead of focusing on voter-fanservice and how he'll be remembered in history books. Regardless of how his actual performance would be, him at least being seriously considered would be a step in the right direction for democracy.

Angelus wrote:

The_Biotic_God wrote:

Angelus wrote:

The Donald isn't a politician.   He can't convince people to give him billions over a bullshit apocalypse theory.  But considering he actually understands the effect of government policy on jobs, he's leagues more qualified than the incompetent quack that wins the average democracy.

To an extent this is true. But he has people under him who worry about the full picture when it comes to economics. Trump is more of a face for a brand more than anything else.

The big advantage to having him, would be his disinterest in visiting SJW organizations for suggestions, and his willingness to run a country like an REIT, instead of focusing on voter-fanservice and how he'll be remembered in history books.  Regardless of how his actual performance would be, him at least being seriously considered would be a step in the right direction for democracy.

I think you are too obsessed with sjw's....they don't really have much of an impact on any politics. Donald Trump is a fucking idiot, you remember the whole birth certificate faggotry?

Donald Trump a right step for democracy... not sure if joking