Halo reach V.S killzone 3

Hey guys i got bored so i decided to test out our new section. I wanted to debate one of my favorite 360 games halo reach against one of my favorite ps3 games killzone 3 (i only have 2 ps3 games so far but its a great game)

HALO REACH:


KILLZONE 3:


Personally im going with halo reach for 2 reasons. Gameplay and features.
First of all the controllers in killzone 3 is very clunky in my opinion. I mean i do like the realistic gameplay style but the way you have to mix things up like covering, aiming and throwing grenades are just so annoying and are far superior in resistance IMO. Second we have the features. I mean c'mon halo reach has forge world, firefight, 4 player co-op, co-op matchmaking, theater mode, customisable options, challenges, ECT. It keeps the multiplayer of halo going for years. I gotta admit i love playing botzone tho.

There needs to be neither button. Battlefield 3 will PWN them. I voted for KZ3 anyway, cause I hate Halo.

Halo Reach. Never really got into Killzone. I'm more of a Resistance fan.

I loved Killzone 2 but I haven't played Killzone 3 so I will have to go Halo Reach.

Halo Reach.I liked the story better, the levels amd the music better.The online is also very balanced.

But KZ 3 was a great game and I certainly dont regret buying it

Halo: Reach

They both suck, but if I had to go with one it would be Killzone.

I prefer Killzone 3's campaign but Halo's multiplayer. Overall, I give it to Halo: Reach.

KZ3 needed a longer campaign with a better plot. It also needs a better multiplayer lobby system.

I liked Killzone 3's campaign but it was too short and the plot was pretty boring. Reach had a better campaign. As far as multiplayer goes, no competition Reach hands down.

Although I've not played KZ3 I reckon I'd prefer it for the gameplay mechanics as a whole but reach has an unreal multiplayer experience. I doubt that kz3 could touch it in those respects. Though I could be surprised.

Halo Reach because it has much tighter controls.

Deus Ex Machina wrote:

I have not played Killzone 3, so I am going with Halo: Reach.

BIAS BIAS!! OBVIOUS TROLL IS OBVIOUS!!! MODS! BAN HIM!!!

Lykos wrote:

Deus Ex Machina wrote:

I have not played Killzone 3, so I am going with Halo: Reach.

BIAS BIAS!! OBVIOUS TROLL IS OBVIOUS!!! MODS! BAN HIM!!!

Your post was very unnecessary.

Lykos wrote:

Deus Ex Machina wrote:

I have not played Killzone 3, so I am going with Halo: Reach.

BIAS BIAS!! OBVIOUS TROLL IS OBVIOUS!!! MODS! BAN HIM!!!

Look who's talking.

Lykos wrote:

Deus Ex Machina wrote:

I have not played Killzone 3, so I am going with Halo: Reach.

BIAS BIAS!! OBVIOUS TROLL IS OBVIOUS!!! MODS! BAN HIM!!!

Pointless post.

This is where the weeding process begins. We said the debate section would be the most serious section of the forum and we gave warnings to everyone. Troll posts won't be tolerated. 5 day ban.

I'll say Halo: Reach because the game feels more complete and well thought out compared to Killzone 3.

Halo always feels like a complete package. The campaign is usually a decent length for a shooter and has good replay value. Throw in a huge competitive multiplayer, Forge, Custom Games, and Theater mode, and you've got basically the value of two full games in one.

I prefer Halo Reach because of the mood it sets in comparison to Killzone.

Halo is a better game overall but I chose Killzone cause I knew it would lose......

Okay, I'm going to give Killzone 3 some credit. Halo Reach is the better game but KZ3 is still a very good FPS. KZ3 is more objective and has more of an emphasis on teamwork than Halo does. To me, KZ3 is like a science fiction version of Battlefield.

If I had to choose between the 2, it'd definitely be Reach. But KZ3 was a refreshing break from run and gun shooters.

The Killzone series has the potential to beat Halo's offerings. GG got gameplay and graphics down so now they need to focus on content. GG needs to add more than 3 multiplayer modes, online co-op, a longer campaign, a better lobby system, etc before it can get on Halo's level.

Alanski wrote:

Okay, I'm going to give Killzone 3 some credit. Halo Reach is the better game but KZ3 is still a very good FPS. KZ3 is more objective and has more of an emphasis on teamwork than Halo does. To me, KZ3 is like a science fiction version of Battlefield.

If I had to choose between the 2, it'd definitely be Reach. But KZ3 was a refreshing break from run and gun shooters.

I totally agree. The best thing about killzone 3 is that the enviroment really look like theres a war going on and killzone is one of the few thats able to get that war feeling.

If Killzone 3 was anything like Killzone 2 I would vote for it. I absolutely fell in love with KZ2.

only played killzone 3 and its sucks

halo reach couldnt be worse